<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Reasons Why James Bond Movies are Chick Flicks Too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justchickflicks.com/2008/11/why-james-bond-movies-are-chick-flicks-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justchickflicks.com/2008/11/why-james-bond-movies-are-chick-flicks-too/</link>
	<description>A uniquely feminine view of movies, Hollywood and the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:27:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: milmirjia</title>
		<link>http://justchickflicks.com/2008/11/why-james-bond-movies-are-chick-flicks-too/comment-page-1/#comment-2119</link>
		<dc:creator>milmirjia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justchickflicks.com/2008/11/26/why-james-bond-movies-are-chick-flicks-too/#comment-2119</guid>
		<description>To point 5 let me just quote a line of the film &quot;Lucky Number Slevin&quot;: 

&quot;Scotland forever!&quot;


For all the other points I couldn&#039;t care less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To point 5 let me just quote a line of the film &#8220;Lucky Number Slevin&#8221;: </p>
<p>&#8220;Scotland forever!&#8221;</p>
<p>For all the other points I couldn&#8217;t care less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarabela</title>
		<link>http://justchickflicks.com/2008/11/why-james-bond-movies-are-chick-flicks-too/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarabela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justchickflicks.com/2008/11/26/why-james-bond-movies-are-chick-flicks-too/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>@Stephen I love the Brosnan Bond too. Although, I think we are in the minority in that opinion. Every seems to adore Daniel Craig.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stephen I love the Brosnan Bond too. Although, I think we are in the minority in that opinion. Every seems to adore Daniel Craig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen</title>
		<link>http://justchickflicks.com/2008/11/why-james-bond-movies-are-chick-flicks-too/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justchickflicks.com/2008/11/26/why-james-bond-movies-are-chick-flicks-too/#comment-99</guid>
		<description>I prefered the Brosnan Bond, and the Moore Bond. I&#039;ve reviewed it on my website. I just love Bond movies, but this last one was way out of sorts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefered the Brosnan Bond, and the Moore Bond. I&#8217;ve reviewed it on my website. I just love Bond movies, but this last one was way out of sorts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarabela</title>
		<link>http://justchickflicks.com/2008/11/why-james-bond-movies-are-chick-flicks-too/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarabela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justchickflicks.com/2008/11/26/why-james-bond-movies-are-chick-flicks-too/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>@ Windy: It seems I am out-numbered on Daniel Craig. I read a few of the Ian Flemming 007 books many years ago, but that was after Sean Connery had taken the role, so he was firmly fixed in my mind as the quintessential Bond....James Bond.

(Glad you stopped by...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Windy: It seems I am out-numbered on Daniel Craig. I read a few of the Ian Flemming 007 books many years ago, but that was after Sean Connery had taken the role, so he was firmly fixed in my mind as the quintessential Bond&#8230;.James Bond.</p>
<p>(Glad you stopped by&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarabela</title>
		<link>http://justchickflicks.com/2008/11/why-james-bond-movies-are-chick-flicks-too/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarabela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justchickflicks.com/2008/11/26/why-james-bond-movies-are-chick-flicks-too/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>@The Anti-Pretty Boy: We agree on Sean Connery as James Bond. He is the perfect combination of handsome leading man and trained assassin. I am afraid I stand alone in my opinion of Daniel Craig. Even some of my gal pals love the Blond Bond. 

But I am glad to have the male point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@The Anti-Pretty Boy: We agree on Sean Connery as James Bond. He is the perfect combination of handsome leading man and trained assassin. I am afraid I stand alone in my opinion of Daniel Craig. Even some of my gal pals love the Blond Bond. </p>
<p>But I am glad to have the male point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windy</title>
		<link>http://justchickflicks.com/2008/11/why-james-bond-movies-are-chick-flicks-too/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Windy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justchickflicks.com/2008/11/26/why-james-bond-movies-are-chick-flicks-too/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a &quot;Bond&quot; fan.  I think the movies are campy and old-fashioned.  I will, however, agree with Anti-Pretty Boy...  If you read the books, Connery and Craig fit the bill the best.  I definately think that Bond movies should just be placed in the category of &quot;mindless entertainment&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a &#8220;Bond&#8221; fan.  I think the movies are campy and old-fashioned.  I will, however, agree with Anti-Pretty Boy&#8230;  If you read the books, Connery and Craig fit the bill the best.  I definately think that Bond movies should just be placed in the category of &#8220;mindless entertainment&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Anti-pretty Boy</title>
		<link>http://justchickflicks.com/2008/11/why-james-bond-movies-are-chick-flicks-too/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>The Anti-pretty Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justchickflicks.com/2008/11/26/why-james-bond-movies-are-chick-flicks-too/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Pierce Brosnan was probably the worst Bond along with Roger Moore. If you read Ian Fleming&#039;s description of Bond, Connery fits the description along with Craig to some extent. A roughneck brought up on the docks made to wear a tuxedo and forced to be civilized. The quintessential assassin and bad boy who thinks every woman is just another plaything to pass the time until it&#039;s time for the job. He&#039;s overcompensating for his brief marriage and one true love. In the words of George Lazenby &quot;Pierce Brosnan is a pussy&quot; .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pierce Brosnan was probably the worst Bond along with Roger Moore. If you read Ian Fleming&#8217;s description of Bond, Connery fits the description along with Craig to some extent. A roughneck brought up on the docks made to wear a tuxedo and forced to be civilized. The quintessential assassin and bad boy who thinks every woman is just another plaything to pass the time until it&#8217;s time for the job. He&#8217;s overcompensating for his brief marriage and one true love. In the words of George Lazenby &#8220;Pierce Brosnan is a pussy&#8221; .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
